Time for us to own up, pay up, and shut up, Settler Canada. This requires more than a holiday, Trudeau. How about following through on some of your early potential?
Back in the hey-day of Bookninja, we ran a cover redesign contest where we asked readers to submit new covers for classic books, but with one caveat: they had to be redesigned for genres that actually sell. The results were hysterical enough to get coverage all over the world, and the winner was this humdinger by Ingrid Paulson who re-imagined The Road as a self-help book for dads.
Now someone is doing something similar, redesigning book covers in a way that is supposed to appeal to men. Neat. I’m going to be straight with you, though: none of these caught my eye except The Valley of the Dolls.
Recently, while wasting time on the literary internet, I stumbled upon something very good: the Instagram account @monobrow_ny, where multi-disciplinary designer Christine Rhee shares creative redesigns for contemporary classics. Recently, she’s been doing a series of “Fake Books for Men,” which are . . . exactly what they sound like: great books, new and old, redesigned as if they were being marketed specifically to men.
I am a big consumer of satire, but apparently lots of people can’t really get it. I snort derisively here in my ivory tower (less ivory and more white plastic or that foam they make takeout coffee cups from, but you get me), but really, it’s a problem.
As modern readers, if we have a harder time understanding satire, it is partly owing to a decline of satire itself, which thrives in environments that repress select ideas. A prevailing theme of satire is how it often expresses opinions that, if spoken plainly, would lead to consequences for the author. Whether it’s an opinion that goes against the interests of a powerful person — such as a politician — or an institution — such as the government — or even one that creates dissent among the general public, satire uses its subversive form to express an idea that isn’t otherwise easy to talk about.
Writing anti-war sentiment now wouldn’t cause the same stir that Catch-22 did during its time. Both increased freedom of speech and the internet have made it easier for people to express themselves and garner support and sympathy for their opinions. Satirical sketches of politicians in the 20th century would also have captured more attention then because there was an idea of risk, of going against the grain to speak your mind. These days, lack of faith in our elected leaders and criticism of the government is the norm. No one blinks at these opinions.
- Writers Trust Fiction Prize shortlist is who’s who;
- Oprah picks new book for club;
- Larry Hill’s first kids book coming;
- Sad days: the Guardian is replacing its (fantastic) books section with a magazine that contains some books coverage;
- This years list of geniuses, according to MacArthur;
- A brief history of Jewish superheroes;
- Why do we keep making kids books about politics?;
- Digitization efforts in Germany;
- The James Patterson amoeba stretches pseudopod toward the pseudopod of the Scholastic amoeba;
- Do “bookless libraries” signal the end of print as we know it?;
- Beatts has a two-parter in-depth look into the supply chain challenges arising from the pandemic and its fallout;
- CBC gets the Polaris music prize nominees to recommend books;
- France to Covid books: meh;
- Is it feasible to pay booksellers a living wage? (See, I think we’re coming at this ass-backward… Pay them a living wage, then figure out how to make it work later);
- Arthur C. Clarke award (one of SFF’s big three) handed out;
- Did you know that McNally Jackson in NYC has started a press?;
- Amanda Gorman flogs kids book on Fallon (__^__^__^__^__^^_____^_______ ^.. .. .. …………. );
- Marvel vs. Ditko…. the lawsuits are flying;
- Anthony Doer is saying things in hopes you’ll buy his new book;
- Are mostly-White MFAs failing us?;
- Can reading change the way you see morality?;
- Ever wanted a peek inside Patricia Highsmith’s diaries? Well, you’re going to get it regardless;
There are definitely events I have “attended”, from the comfort of my track suit and armchair, that I otherwise would not because they were available online. Do they replace in-person events? No, of course not. How else will we have whispered conversations while other people are pouring their hearts out on stage? That said, there are reasons we should keep the virtual aspect as we move on after Covid.
A couple of months into the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw the beginnings of something…a little bit magical. In the midst of lockdowns and closures and social distancing, people still wanted to talk about books. There were still books coming out, and people were still buying them (they might have even been buying more). Someone realized that they could host author talks via webinar and meeting platforms, or even on Facebook, and the trend took off. I found myself attending book talks sponsored by Loyalty Books in D.C., The Ripped Bodice in L.A., and Left Bank Books in St. Louis, among others. All from my computer in Tucson (and occasionally mirrored to my big TV).
The Tucson Festival of Books was able to include authors they’d probably been inviting for years, because this time they didn’t have to travel. Not only was I able to participate in a book community that had been becoming increasingly harder to take part in in person if you couldn’t shell out the cash to attend large conferences and conventions, but I could take the time to learn about folks I might never have encountered otherwise. Instead of trying to fly out authors to attend a book festival, anyone could join from anywhere. Instead of despairing that panelists wouldn’t use their microphones in a large room, you could turn on closed captioning in most platforms. Instead of FOMO, you had too many to choose from.
It was awesome.
It’s become patently clear that Ms. Ninja is the pony to be on in this house, and here’s why: she actually writes things people want to read. Also, she does so while maintaining a literary skill and flair, which is rare in the genre market. Go get her book. Listen to her talk to Shelagh Rogers on The Next Chapter.
Elisabeth de Mariaffi is a writer from St. John’s. Her debut collection of stories, How to Get Along with Women, was longlisted for the 2013 Scotiabank Giller Prize. Her other books include the thrillers Hysteria and The Devil You Know.
Her latest novel is The Retreat, a thriller that tells the story of a former principal dancer, Maeve Martin, who arrives at a snowy mountain retreat called High Water Center for the Arts. Maeve’s plans to start her own dance company are derailed after an avalanche traps everyone inside and guests start dropping one by one.
The novel, the author told Shelagh Rogers, is in fact based on de Mariaffi’s experience at Alberta’s Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity, which she spent one winter working on her writing. She talked to Rogers how The Retreat came to be.
- Kevin Hardcastle offers 5 tips for being a better writer;
- Managing Frankfurt from home….again;
- Malcolm Gladwell is catching it for not finding Norm Macdonald funny;
- NBF calls off its in-person awards ceremony in favour of sanity;
- Princely pachyderm Babar looks great for 90;
- Hey, Maeve Binchy still has stuff to say;
- The darkness that lies beneath your “cozy mysteries”;
- How close should a close reading get?;
- Dan Savage looks back at 30 years of sex advice;
- When being a full-time author seriously interrupts your reading time;
- Now you can browns Fitzgerald’s papers (incl Gatsby ms) online;
Are we suffering as a culture from a sort of “Influencerenza” infection that is taking over most forms of art? Is publishing these multi-platform people through traditional channels (generally reserved for those of us still living in our little “pioneer villages” of art in which we dress up in period clothes and go about our business for others to watch and think of as quaint) helping our industry compete or slowly driving it further into irrelevance?
The biggest draw for publishers bidding for books by influencers is that they have committed audiences ready and waiting. Gleam understands the importance of these figures: on its website, it lists authors’ Instagram and Twitter followings beneath their biographies. When publisher Fenella Bates acquired the rights for Hinch Yourself Happy in December 2018, she noted Sophie Hinchcliffe’s impressively quick rise on Instagram, having grown her following from 1,000 to 1.4 million in just six months. Upon publication in April 2019, the book sold 160,302 copies in three days, becoming the second fastest-selling non-fiction title in the UK (after the “slimming” recipe book Pinch of Nom).
Anyone who has harnessed such an audience to sell products, promote a campaign, or otherwise cultivate a successful personal brand is an exceptionally desirable candidate to a publisher that wants to sell books. What’s more, the mechanics of social media means the size of these audiences is easily measurable, making the authors “cast-iron propositions” for publishers, said Caroline Sanderson, the associate editor of the trade magazine the Bookseller, who has noticed a huge increase in the number of books written by social media stars over the last couple of years.
- CBC non-fiction prize shortlist blessedly filled with people I don’t know;
- I’ve only seen three of these NBA poetry finalists (Espada, Gander, and Nguyen), and while they’re all enjoyable, I feel the Nguyen is the most exciting of them;
- Political writing prize picks winner;
- Ze Germans have ze prize for ze novel;
- On John Ashbery in the age of social media? Okay, I’ll read that;
- Who is the thief stealing books before they’re even released?;
- Free workshop on contracts for freelance journos;
- Netflix picks up Roald Dahl’s catalogue… let the overlooking of historical realities begin!;
- American school board that banned Black books reverses decision (never let anyone tell you protest does nothing, kids);
- How are romance novel covers made?;
- A story vending machine in New York? FTR, Toronto Poetry Vendors did this over 10 years ago;
- ‘Member back when the Nobel folks rejected Tolkien?;